Continuum beliefs and mental illness stigma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of correlation and intervention studies

88Citations
Citations of this article
131Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background Promulgating a continuum model of mental health and mental illness has been proposed as a way to reduce stigma by decreasing notions of differentness. This systematic review and meta-analysis examines whether continuum beliefs are associated with lower stigma, and whether continuum interventions reduce stigma. Methods Following a pre-defined protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42019123606), we searched three electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and PsycINFO) yielding 6726 studies. After screening, we included 33 studies covering continuum beliefs, mental illness, and stigma. Of these, 13 studies were included in meta-analysis. Results Continuum beliefs are consistently associated with lower stigma. Interventions were effective at manipulating continuum beliefs but differ in their effects on stigmatising attitudes. Conclusions We discuss whether and to what extent attitudes towards people with mental illness can be improved by providing information on a mental health-mental illness continuum. It appeared to be relevant whether interventions promoted a feeling of 'us' and a process of identification with the person with mental illness. We discuss implications for the design of future interventions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Peter, L. J., Schindler, S., Sander, C., Schmidt, S., Muehlan, H., McLaren, T., … Schomerus, G. (2021, April 1). Continuum beliefs and mental illness stigma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of correlation and intervention studies. Psychological Medicine. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291721000854

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free