Robotized underwater interventions

4Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Working in underwater environments poses many challenges for robotic systems. One of them is the low bandwidth and high latency of underwater acoustic communications, which limits the possibility of interaction with submerged robots. One solution is to have a tether cable to enable high speed and low latency communications, but that requires a support vessel and increases costs. For that reason, autonomous underwater robots are a very interesting solution. Several research projects have demonstrated autonomy capabilities of Underwater Vehicle Manipulator Systems (UVMS) in performing basic manipulation tasks, and, moving a step further, this chapter will present a unifying architecture for the control of an UVMS, comprehensive of all the control objectives that an UVMS should take into account, their different priorities and the typical mission phases that an UVMS has to tackle. The proposed strategy is supported both by a complete simulated execution of a test-case mission and experimental results.

References Powered by Scopus

MANIPULABILITY OF ROBOTIC MECHANISMS.

2082Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Design and control of autonomous underwater robots: A survey

606Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Visual navigation for mobile robots: A survey

594Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Underwater manipulators: A review

273Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The analysis of dynamic coupling for Intervention-AUV via a hybrid space approach

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

On Autonomous Robotic Cooperation Capabilities within Factory and Logistic Scenarios

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Casalino, G., Simetti, E., & Wanderlingh, F. (2017). Robotized underwater interventions. In Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences (Vol. 474, pp. 365–386). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55372-6_17

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 3

43%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

29%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

29%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 6

86%

Computer Science 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free