Biomarkers for predicting response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in drug-sensitive and drug-resistant human bladder cancer cells

10Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) family is reportedly overexpressed in bladder cancer, and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been suggested as treatment. Gefitinib (Iressa) is a selective inhibitor of the EGFR and lapatinib is a dual inhibitor of both the EGFR and HER2 (human EGFR type 2 receptor). Both compounds compete with the binding of ATP to the tyrosine kinase domain of the respective receptors to inhibit receptor autophosphorylation causing suppression of signal transduction. Unfortunately, resistance to these inhibitors is a major clinical issue. The purpose of the present study was to use protein array analysis to compare the signaling pathway(s) induced by gefitinib and lapatinib, in UM-UC-5 (drug-sensitive) and UM-UC-14 (drug-resistant) bladder cancer cells and to identify molecular markers that may be useful predictors of their efficacy. The results revealed that phosphorylation of EGFR, HER3, Met and ERK1/2 was markedly overexpressed in the sensitive cell line (UM-UC-5) and was strongly inhibited by the TKIs. Other notable differences included decreased phosphorylation of RSK, GSK3, AMPK, Akt and c-Jun by TKIs in the sensitive cells. In contrast, phosphorylated p53 was highly expressed in the resistant cell line (UM-UC-14) and TKIs had no effect in the resistant cells. Overall results suggest that phosphorylated HER3, ERK1/2 and p53 may be used as biomarkers to determine the sensitivity of bladder cancers to TKIs. In particular, a combination of these markers may be more likely to predict the sensitivity to TKIs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Li, J., Lin, B., Li, X., Tang, X., He, Z., & Zhou, K. (2015). Biomarkers for predicting response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in drug-sensitive and drug-resistant human bladder cancer cells. Oncology Reports, 33(2), 951–957. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2014.3639

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free