Evaluation of the Efficacy of Neo-endo, Hyflex Re-treatment File Systems and H-Files for Removing Gutta-Percha From Root Canal Treated Tooth by Using Stereomicroscope—An In Vitro Study

2Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of Neo-endo, Hyflextm retreatment file systems, and H-files for removing gutta-percha from root canal treated tooth. Materials and Methods: Thirty extracted single-rooted human teeth with a single canal were opted. The shaping of the root canals was done with pro-taper universal files and later obturated. The samples were grouped based on the file system chosen for removing the obturating material: Group I-H-files; Group II-Neo-endo retreatment files; Group III-HyflexTM retreatment files. The quantity of remaining gutta-percha still present after the retreatment procedure was assessed under a stereomicroscope. One-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to statistically analyze the data. Results: HyflexTM files left less remaining filling material than with Neo-endo and H-files. Conclusion: The HyflexTM retreatment files were most efficient in removing the gutta-percha from the root canal.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Karunakar, P., Ranga Reddy, M. S., Karteek, B. S., Reddy, C. L. C., Swetha, C., Racha, K., & Waheed, S. (2024). Evaluation of the Efficacy of Neo-endo, Hyflex Re-treatment File Systems and H-Files for Removing Gutta-Percha From Root Canal Treated Tooth by Using Stereomicroscope—An In Vitro Study. Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences, 16(Suppl 2), S1695–S1699. https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_970_23

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free