Performance of mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) varieties at different NPS rates and row spacing at Kindo Koysha district, Southern Ethiopia

17Citations
Citations of this article
67Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Mung bean (Vigna radiataL.) is a pulse crop with multiple uses, yet the crop was not introduced in the study area. Further, there is a lack of information on improved agronomic technologies for the crop in the study area. Hence, a field trial was conducted to evaluate the effects of inter-row spacing and fertilizer rate on the performance of mung bean varieties at Kindo Koysha district, in 2018. The experiment comprised factorial combinations of two varieties (Shewarobit, N-26), three inter-row spacing of planting (20, 30 and 40 cm) and four NPS fertilizer rate (0, 50, 100 and 150 kg ha−1) was laid out using randomized complete block design with three replications. The results indicated that the three-way interaction effect of variety, fertilizer and row spacing significantly influenced above-ground dry biomass. Further, the two-way interaction effect of variety with fertilizer rate significantly (P < 0.05) influenced yield and yield attributing traits. Accordingly, the maximum number of pod per plant (14.7), grain yield ha−1(1294.7 kg ha−1) and harvest index were recorded for N-26 variety at 150 kg NPS ha−1. Moreover, economic analysis also indicated that the highest net benefit of 33168.00 ETB ha−1 was recorded for mung bean variety N-26 grown at 100 kg NPS ha−1. Based on the result of this study, it can be tentatively concluded that producing variety N-26 at the rate of 100 kg NPS ha−1found to be promising treatment combination for better productivity and higher economic return in the study area.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kaysha, K., Shanka, D., & Bibiso, M. (2020). Performance of mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) varieties at different NPS rates and row spacing at Kindo Koysha district, Southern Ethiopia. Cogent Food and Agriculture, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2020.1771112

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free