Inductive generalization is a defeasible type of inference which we use to reason from the particular to the universal. First, a number of systems are presented that provide different ways of implementing this inference pattern within first-order logic. These systems are defined within the adaptive logics framework for modeling defeasible reasoning. Next, the logics are re-interpreted as criteria of confirmation. It is argued that they withstand the comparison with two qualitative theories of confirmation, Hempel’s satisfaction criterion and hypothetico-deductive confirmation.
CITATION STYLE
Beirlaen, M. (2017). Qualitative Inductive Generalization and Confirmation. In Springer Handbooks (pp. 231–248). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30526-4_11
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.