Governments at all levels have become increasingly involved in initiating and funding projects within which community residents work collaboratively with local service providers in the development of programs for the betterment of themselves, their families, and their community. Inherent in these initiatives, however, are a number of possible sources of tension which, left unresolved, may hamper the intentions of governments to seed grass-roots solutions to community problems. A qualitative research methodology was used to examine the nature of the relationship between government and community representatives (both residents and local service providers) in establishing community-based primary prevention programs under the auspices of the Better Beginnings, Better Futures initiative of the Government of Ontario. We examine a number of issues and tensions that have arisen from this project, both during the development of the program model by the government, and through to its implementation in several communities in the province.
CITATION STYLE
Sylvestre, J. C., Pancer, S. M., Brophy, K., & Cameron, G. (1994). The planning and implementation of government-sponsored community-based primary prevention: A case study. Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health, 13(2), 189–195. https://doi.org/10.7870/cjcmh-1994-0020
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.