Initial experience of drug-eluting bead-transcatheter arterial chemoembolization after lipiodol-based transcatheter arterial chemoembolization failure for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

5Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the potential safety and efficacy of drug-eluting bead-transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) in treating TACE-refractory hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the treatment outcomes of DEB-TACE for 41 HCC nodules in 30 patients who were refractory to conventional TACE (c-TACE) according to tumor response. The antitumor response was evaluated according to mRECIST criteria, and changes in alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), albumin-bilirubin score, the incidence of adverse events, and the time to disease progression were observed. Results: The objective response rate and disease control rates were 60.98% and 95.12% at 4 weeks after DEB-TACE, 63.41% and 92.68% at 8 weeks, respectively. The median time of disease progression was 4.60 ± 0.23 months. The AFP of patients decreased continuously at 2–6 weeks after operation, and the AFP at 4 weeks was significantly lower than that at 2 weeks (P = 0.038). Adverse reactions were well tolerated, and no grade 4 adverse reactions were reported. The albumin-bilirubin score did not deteriorate within 6 weeks. Conclusion: DEB-TACE has potential efficacy and safety after failure of c-TACE in patients with advanced liver cancer. Further studies are needed to confirm the efficacy of DEB-TACE treatment after failure of c-TACE.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liu, K. C., Lv, W. F., Lu, D., Hou, C. L., Xie, J., Lu, Y. H., … Liu, J. (2021). Initial experience of drug-eluting bead-transcatheter arterial chemoembolization after lipiodol-based transcatheter arterial chemoembolization failure for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Management and Research, 13, 7973–7980. https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S332571

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free