Estimating downwind concentrations of viable airborne microorganisms in dynamic atmospheric conditions.

42Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A Gaussian plume model has been modified to include an airborne microbial survival term that is a best-fit function of laboratory experimental data of weather variables. The model has been included in an algorithm using microbial source strength and local hourly mean weather data to drive the model through a summer- and winter-day cycle. For illustrative purposes, a composite airborne "virus" (developed using actual characteristics from two viruses) was used to show how wind speed could have a major modulating effect on near-source viable concentrations. For example, at high wind speeds such as those occurring during the day, or with short travel times, near-source locations experience high viable concentrations because the microorganisms have not had time to become inactivated. As the travel time increases, because of slow wind speed or longer distances, die-off modulation by sunshine, relative humidity, temperature, etc., potentially becomes increasingly predominant.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment: Second Edition

365Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The ecology of bacteria in the alfresco atmosphere

205Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Long-distance airborne transport of infectious PRRSV and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae from a swine population infected with multiple viral variants

199Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lighthart, B., & Mohr, A. J. (1987). Estimating downwind concentrations of viable airborne microorganisms in dynamic atmospheric conditions. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 53(7), 1580–1583. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.53.7.1580-1583.1987

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

45%

Researcher 8

40%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

15%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10

53%

Environmental Science 5

26%

Engineering 2

11%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free