Variations in mechanical stiffness alter microvascular sprouting and stability in a PEG hydrogel model of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

3Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: Microvascular remodeling is governed by biomechanical and biochemical cues which are dysregulated in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Understanding how these cues impact endothelial cell-pericyte interactions necessitates a model system in which both variables can be independently and reproducibly modulated. In this study we develop a tunable hydrogel-based angiogenesis assay to study how varying angiogenic growth factors and environmental stiffness affect sprouting and vessel organization. Methods: Lungs harvested from mice were cut into 1 mm long segments then cultured on hydrogels having one of seven possible stiffness and growth factor combinations. Time course, brightfield, and immunofluorescence imaging were used to observe and quantify sprout formation. Results: Our assay was able to support angiogenesis in a comparable manner to Matrigel in soft 2 kPa gels while enabling tunability to study the effects of stiffness on sprout formation. Matrigel and 2 kPa groups contained significantly more samples with sprouts when compared to the stiffer 10 and 20 kPa gels. Growth factor treatment did not have as obvious an effect, although the 20 kPa PDGF + FGF-treated group had significantly longer vessels than the vascular endothelial growth factor-treated group. Conclusions: We have developed a novel, tunable hydrogel assay for the creation of lung explant vessel organoids which can be modulated to study the impact of specific environmental cues on vessel formation and maturation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Leonard-Duke, J., Bruce, A. C., Peirce, S. M., & Taite, L. J. (2023). Variations in mechanical stiffness alter microvascular sprouting and stability in a PEG hydrogel model of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Microcirculation, 30(5–6). https://doi.org/10.1111/micc.12817

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free