Comparing the effect of naturally restored forest and grassland on carbon sequestration and its vertical distribution in the Chinese Loess Plateau

63Citations
Citations of this article
82Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Vegetation restoration has been conducted in the Chinese Loess Plateau (CLP) since the 1950s, and large areas of farmland have been converted to forest and grassland, which largely results in SOC change. However, there has been little comparative research on SOC sequestration and distribution between secondary forest and restored grassland. Therefore, we selected typical secondary forest (SF-1 and SF-2) and restored grassland (RG-1 and RG-2) sites and determined the SOC storage. Moreover, to illustrate the factors resulting in possible variance in SOC sequestration, we measured the soil δ13C value. The average SOC content was 6.8, 9.9, 17.9 and 20.4 g kg-1 at sites SF-1, SF-2, RG-1 and RG-2, respectively. Compared with 0-100 cm depth, the percentage of SOC content in the top 20 cm was 55.1%, 55.3%, 23.1%, and 30.6% at sites SF-1, SF-2, RG-1 and RG-2, suggesting a higher SOC content in shallow layers in secondary forest and in deeper layers in restored grassland. The variation of soil δ13C values with depth in this study might be attributed to the mixing of new and old carbon and kinetic fractionation during the decomposition of SOM by microbes, whereas the impact of the Suess effect (the decline of 13C atmospheric CO2 values with the burning of fossil fuel since the Industrial Revolution) was minimal. The soil δ13C value increased sharply in the top 20 cm, which then increased slightly in deeper layers in secondary forest, indicating a main carbon source of surface litter. However the soil δ13C values exhibited slow increases in the whole profile in the restored grasslands, suggesting that the contribution of roots to soil carbon in deeper layers played an important role. We suggest that naturally restored grassland would be a more effective vegetation type for SOC sequestration due to higher carbon input from roots in the CLP. © 2012 Wei et al.

Figures

  • Figure 1. Sample sites (filled red pentagram) of this study at Yunwu Mountain and Ziwuling Mountain.
  • Figure 2. The difference in bulk density at secondary forest (SF-1, SF-2) and restored grassland (RG-1, RG-2). Error bars are standard error (plot to plot and depth to depth, N = 6). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0040123.g002
  • Figure 3. The difference in soil organic carbon (SOC) content.
  • Table 1. Soil organic carbon (SOC) storage (6 standard deviation) at sites secondary forest (SF-1 and SF-2) and restored grassland (RG-1 and RG-2).
  • Figure 4. The difference in soil C/N ratios among sites (a) and depths (b). SF-1 and SF-2 are sites of secondary forest while RG-1 and RG-2 are sites of restored grassland. Error bars are standard error (plot to plot and depth to depth, N = 6). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0040123.g004
  • Figure 5. Changes in soil d13C values with depth and vegetation restoration types. SF-1 and SF-2 are sites of secondary forest while RG-1 and RG-2 are sites of restored grassland. Error bars are standard error (plot to plot and depth to depth, N = 6). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0040123.g005
  • Figure 6. Variation of carbon isotope fractionation factors (a) at different depth among study sites. SF-1 and SF-2 are sites of secondary forest while RG-1 and RG-2 are sites of restored grassland. Error bars are standard error (plot to plot and depth to depth, N = 6). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0040123.g006
  • Figure 7. Relationship between soil d13C values and soil organic carbon (SOC) content. SF-1 and SF-2 are sites of secondary forest while RG-1 and RG-2 are sites of restored grassland. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0040123.g007

References Powered by Scopus

Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security

6044Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The vertical distribution of soil organic carbon and its relation to climate and vegetation

4243Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Soil carbon stocks and land use change: A meta analysis

3118Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Soil stoichiometry and carbon storage in long-term afforestation soil affected by understory vegetation diversity

144Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Natural vegetation restoration is more beneficial to soil surface organic and inorganic carbon sequestration than tree plantation on the Loess Plateau of China

112Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Successional Trajectory Over 10Years of Vegetation Restoration of Abandoned Slope Croplands in the Hill-Gully Region of the Loess Plateau

87Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wei, J., Cheng, J., Li, W., & Liu, W. (2012). Comparing the effect of naturally restored forest and grassland on carbon sequestration and its vertical distribution in the Chinese Loess Plateau. PLoS ONE, 7(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040123

Readers over time

‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 30

61%

Researcher 10

20%

Professor / Associate Prof. 8

16%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Environmental Science 24

56%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11

26%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 5

12%

Social Sciences 3

7%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 25

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0