Urine microscopy as a biomarker of Acute Kidney Injury following cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass

10Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: Acute kidney injury (AKI) occurs in about 22% of the patients undergoing cardiac surgery and 2.3% requires renal replacement therapy (RRT). The current diagnostic criteria for AKI by increased serum creatinine levels have limitations and new biomarkers are being tested. Urine sediment may be considered a biomarker and it can help to differentiate pre-renal (functional) from renal (intrinsic) AKI. Aims: To investigate the microscopic urinalysis in the AKI diagnosis in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Methods: One hundred and fourteen patients, mean age 62.3 years, 67.5 % male, with creatinine 0.91 mg/dL (SD 0.22) had a urine sample examined in the first 24 h after the surgery. We looked for renal tubular epithelial cells (RTEC) and granular casts (GC) and associated the results with AKI development as defined by KDIGO criteria. Results: Twenty three patients (20.17%) developed AKI according to the serum creatinine criterion and 76 (66.67%) by the urine output criterion. Four patients required RRT. Mortality was 3.51 %. The use of urine creatinine criterion to predict AKI showed a sensitivity of 34.78 % and specificity of 86.81%, positive likelihood ratio of 2.64 and negative likelihood ratio of 0.75, AUCROC of 0.584 (95%CI: 0.445-0.723). For the urine output criterion sensitivity was 23.68 % and specificity 92.11%, AUC-ROC was 0.573 (95%CI: 0.465-0.680). Conclusion: RTEC and GC in urine sample detected by microscopy is a highly specific biomarker for early AKI diagnosis after cardiac surgery.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Goldani, J. C., Poloni, J. A., Klaus, F., Kist, R., Pacheco, L. S., & Keitel, E. (2020). Urine microscopy as a biomarker of Acute Kidney Injury following cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Brazilian Journal of Nephrology, 42(1), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2018-0133

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free