Public Sector and Corruption in Nigeria: An Ethical and Institutional Framework of Analysis

  • Casimir K
  • Izueke E
  • Nzekwe I
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The paper examines the imperatives of good ethical conduct in the conduct of government business in Nigeria. As government business grows in complexity with the adoption of technological innovations in government, governance in Nigeria’s public sector becomes more problematic and ethically tasking as a result of endemic corruption. An evaluation of the collapse of institutional measures and codes of conduct puts in place to ensure high standard of behavior, using institutional theory suggests that moral contradictions in institutional behavior expectation from the public deepen daily. The perceived lack of an effective ethical organizational framework to coordinate the activities of various institutions has astronomically worsened unethical practices such as corruption in the Nigerian public service. The paper recommends a more realistic African traditional approach to ethical restraint of public servants from indulging in corrupt behavior by subjecting them to customary oath taking based upon the theistic values of fear of sin against mother earth (Ani Casimir, 2009), (a departure from the western style, which sees public service as no man’s business: Ekene, 2012). These core African values that emanate from theistic humanism should also permeate the various anti-corruption organizational frameworks in Nigeria to coordinate the national fight against corruption in the public sector. The behavioral and errant departure of civil servants and Nigeria’s public service from the core human values that ensure transparent private and public conduct of individuals have resulted in underperformance and underdevelopment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Casimir, K. C. A., Izueke, E. M., & Nzekwe, I. F. (2014). Public Sector and Corruption in Nigeria: An Ethical and Institutional Framework of Analysis. Open Journal of Philosophy, 04(03), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2014.43029

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free