Middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus: A case-control study of hospitalized patients

203Citations
Citations of this article
185Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background. There is a paucity of data regarding the differentiating characteristics of patients with laboratory-confirmed and those negative for Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV). Methods. This is a hospital-based case-control study comparing MERS-CoV-positive patients (cases) with MERS-CoV-negative controls. Results. A total of 17 case patients and 82 controls with a mean age of 60.7 years and 57 years, respectively (P =. 553), were included. No statistical differences were observed in relation to sex, the presence of a fever or cough, and the presence of a single or multilobar infiltrate on chest radiography. The case patients were more likely to be overweight than the control group (mean body mass index, 32 vs 27.8; P =. 035), to have diabetes mellitus (87% vs 47%; odds ratio [OR], 7.24; P =. 015), and to have end-stage renal disease (33% vs 7%; OR, 7; P =. 012). At the time of admission, tachypnea (27% vs 60%; OR, 0.24; P =. 031) and respiratory distress (15% vs 51%; OR, 0.15; P =. 012) were less frequent among case patients. MERS-CoV patients were more likely to have a normal white blood cell count than the control group (82% vs 52%; OR, 4.33; P =. 029). Admission chest radiography with interstitial infiltrates was more frequent in case patients than in controls (67% vs 20%; OR, 8.13; P =. 001). Case patients were more likely to be admitted to the intensive care unit (53% vs 20%; OR, 4.65; P =. 025) and to have a high mortality rate (76% vs 15%; OR, 18.96; P

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Al-Tawfiq, J. A., Hinedi, K., Ghandour, J., Khairalla, H., Musleh, S., Ujayli, A., & Memish, Z. A. (2014). Middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus: A case-control study of hospitalized patients. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 59(2), 160–165. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciu226

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free