heart disease (CHD) is increasing because medical and surgical care received during childhood has improved, resulting in an additional cohort at risk for malignant arrhythmias. SCD accounts for 20% to 25% of mortality in the adult CHD population. 5-7 ICDs are able to successfully treat life-threatening VAs in patients with adult CHD and inherited arrhyth-mia syndromes. 8-10 However, ICD use in this generally younger patient population is complicated, with high rates of device-related complications occurring over many decades of use, including inappropriate shocks, device-related infections, and lead displacement or failure. 11 Furthermore, appropriate selection criteria for ICD implantation in these patients are poorly defined due to a paucity of randomized controlled trials in such patients. Current professional guidelines therefore rely on data from non-randomized studies and on expert opinion. 11 This review describes available evidence-based risk strat-ification for SCD and current guideline-driven management strategies for the use of ICDs in patients with CHD and inherited arrhythmia syndromes.
CITATION STYLE
Goldstein, S., Ward, C., & Al-Khatib, S. (2017). The Use of Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillators in the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death: A Focus on Congenital Heart Disease and Inherited Arrhythmia Syndromes. The Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management, 9(1), 2996–3005. https://doi.org/10.19102/icrm.2018.090103
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.