Competitive Remix Practice and Networks of Support in Electronic Dance Music Economies

1Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The rapid development and dissemination of social media fueled competition platforms has led to immediate shifts in the practices of creative workers in fields related to contest offerings. In Electronic Dance Music (EDM), crowdsourced competitive remix platforms have reoriented certain practices into networks of competition, where winning distinction is often only part of a larger process of further enmeshing DJs, music producers and their supporters in the social media fueled ecosystems that these websites have created. In order to begin to analyze the impact of remix competitions on producers and their personal and professional networks, I intend to trace a line of recent history and debate to reveal the connections linking EDM websites, labels, marketers, DJs, producers and supporters and their engagement with remix competition platforms. I will examine the call for support that is involved in so much of socially networked EDM communication between contestants and their peers surrounding these remix contests.

References Powered by Scopus

Struggling with the creative class

1868Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Crowdsourcing as a model for problem solving: An introduction and cases

1521Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

'Meat, mask, burden': Probing the contours of the branded 'self'

415Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Stars inside have reached outside: The effects of electronic dance music DJs’ social standing and musical identity on track success

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Karpetz, J. (2014). Competitive Remix Practice and Networks of Support in Electronic Dance Music Economies. Dancecult, 6(2), 22–41. https://doi.org/10.12801/1947-5403.2014.06.02.02

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

71%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

29%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Arts and Humanities 3

43%

Social Sciences 2

29%

Computer Science 1

14%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free