Forest landscape restoration: Who decides? A governance approach to forest landscape restoration

23Citations
Citations of this article
168Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Forest landscape restoration is currently gaining momentum as a means of jointly addressing climate change and future agricultural demands. Forest landscape restoration does not aim to 'just' restore forests, but to restore them from a broader perspective on the landscape as a whole, allowing simultaneous restoration of the ecological and productive functions of forests. There are many ways in which forested landscapes can be restored, depending on the biophysical characteristics of the landscapes, but also, and even more so on the interests of a landscape's stakeholders, and the way in which they negotiate, and make landscape decisions. This complex process of decision making between stakeholders operating at various levels and scales is usually referred to as landscape governance. Landscape governance often does not tally with the political-administrative structures of states, because landscapes are usually not incorporated as a formal layer in the political and administrative structures of states. Instead, landscape governance is captured in a messy web of multi-actor networks, institutions and institutional arrangements, (in)formally constructed across levels and scales, more or less embedded in locally existing livelihood strategies and socially embedded institutional frames. Global initiatives on forest landscape restoration are therefore not to be institutionalized along structures of formal (de)centralized structures of states, but 'bricoled' though informal networks, multi-stakeholder coalitions, or public-private partnerships engaged in processes of landscape learning, where stakeholders learn to create and share institutional space. In this way, forest landscape restoration can become a catalyst for institutional change, transforming governance into a process of place-bound negotiation and decision making, to collectively make place. © 2013 ABECO.

References Powered by Scopus

Social and ecological resilience: Are they related?

3130Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Access and property: A question of power and authority

527Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development

503Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Participatory Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation of Multi-Stakeholder Platforms in Integrated Landscape Initiatives

105Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Key challenges for governing forest and landscape restoration across different contexts

64Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Governance and management dynamics of landscape restoration at multiple scales: Learning from successful environmental managers in Sweden

55Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Van Oosten, C. (2013). Forest landscape restoration: Who decides? A governance approach to forest landscape restoration. Natureza a Conservacao, 11(2), 119–126. https://doi.org/10.4322/natcon.2013.020

Readers over time

‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2508162432

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 63

61%

Researcher 30

29%

Professor / Associate Prof. 8

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Environmental Science 49

45%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36

33%

Social Sciences 20

18%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 5

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0