Exact solution for a metapopulation version of Schelling's model

13Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In 1971, Schelling introduced a model in which families move if they have too many neighbors of the opposite type. In this paper, we will consider a metapopulation version of the model in which a city is divided into N neighborhoods, each of which has L houses. There are ρNL red families and ρNL blue families for some ρ < 1/2. Families are happy if there are =ρcL families of the opposite type in their neighborhood and unhappy otherwise. Each family moves to each vacant house at rates that depend on their happiness at their current location and that of their destination. Our main result is that if neighborhoods are large, then there are critical values ρb < ρd < ρc, so that for ρ < ρb, the two types are distributed randomly in equilibrium. When ρ > ρb, a newsegregated equilibrium appears; for ρb < ρ

Author supplied keywords

References Powered by Scopus

Dynamic models of segregation

3144Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Understanding the social context of the Schelling segregation model

210Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Schelling's spatial proximity model of segregation revisited

179Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Multidimensional urban segregation: toward a neural network measure

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Emergent dense suburbs in a schelling metapopulation model: A simulation approach

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Axiomatic theory and simulation: A philosophy of science perspective on schelling’s segregation model

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Durrett, R., & Zhang, Y. (2014, September 30). Exact solution for a metapopulation version of Schelling’s model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1414915111

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

37%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

37%

Researcher 4

21%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Physics and Astronomy 6

50%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

17%

Arts and Humanities 2

17%

Mathematics 2

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free