A Prospective, Randomized, Open-Label Study to Evaluate Two Management Strategies for Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Patients Newly on Treatment with Dabigatran

9Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: In the pivotal RE-LY trial, dabigatran etexilate (DE) at the dose of 150-mg twice daily (BID), significantly reduced total stroke and ischemic stroke compared with warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), while the 110-mg BID dose had efficacy equivalent to warfarin, and major bleeds were significantly reduced. Both DE regimens were generally well tolerated; however, approximately 4% of the patients discontinued treatment with DE due to gastrointestinal (GI) discomfort. Methods: Clinical trial NCT01493557 was a multicenter, randomized, active control, open-label study to assess the efficacy of two simple GI symptom (GIS) management strategies in DE-treated patients who developed GIS: (1) concurrent treatment with the proton pump inhibitor pantoprazole (DE-P), or (2) ingestion of DE after a meal (DE-M). Patients were initially randomized to either GIS management strategy. If the first did not resolve their GIS, patients had the option to “add on” the alternative strategy. Results: A total of 1067 patients with NVAF received DE therapy BID for 3 months (United States, 150-mg or 75-mg; Canada, 150-mg or 110-mg). Of these, 117 (11%) patients reported GIS and were randomized to one of two GIS management strategies. At 4 weeks, a significantly higher rate of complete or partial effectiveness was observed in patients on DE-P than in those receiving DE-M, [50/58 (86.2%) versus 40/59 (67.8%), respectively; p = 0.0273]. Patients with ongoing GIS were asked to “add on” the alternate strategy for an additional 4 weeks. Overall, 92/117 (78.6%) of randomized patients experienced complete or partial effectiveness using either the initial strategy or a combination of the two strategies: DE-P, 47 (81.0%); and DE-M, 45 (76.3%, no significant difference) (by initial strategy). Conclusion: The majority of patients enrolled either did not experience GIS at all, or their GIS resolved using either one individually, or a combination of the two strategies described. Trial registration: http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01493557.

References Powered by Scopus

Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation

9799Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Newly identified events in the RE-LY trial

678Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Pharmacology, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Dabigatran Etexilate, an Oral Direct Thrombin Inhibitor

321Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)

7584Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

NOACs for treatment of venous thromboembolism in clinical practice

20Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation, developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

O’Dea, D., Whetteckey, J., & Ting, N. (2016). A Prospective, Randomized, Open-Label Study to Evaluate Two Management Strategies for Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Patients Newly on Treatment with Dabigatran. Cardiology and Therapy, 5(2), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40119-016-0071-5

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 15

79%

Researcher 3

16%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 17

65%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 7

27%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

4%

Neuroscience 1

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free