Differences in neurophysiologic effects between CPAP and a novel high-flow therapy system

  • Tiffin N
  • Connelly S
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

CPAP therapy for respiratory insufficiency is an established and accepted mode of therapy; however, patient compliance remains an issue. Recent studies have shown that high-flow therapy (HFT), which uses high flows of warmed and humidified air/O2 mixtures through a nasal cannula, can also be effective in treating respiratory insufficiency. Although a nasal cannula is commonly preferred over a CPAP mask, patient comfort with HFT and CPAP has not been measured empirically. We sought to examine the autonomic neurophysiologic responses as a measure of comfort between these therapies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tiffin, N., & Connelly, S. (2012). Differences in neurophysiologic effects between CPAP and a novel high-flow therapy system. Critical Care, 16(S1). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc10740

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free