The paper gives a new argument for anti-individualism in the philosophy of mind, based essentially on considerations given by Tuomela’s account of we- mode attitudes. It connects Tuomela’s work with a discussion that was shaped by Tyler Burge. The central argument of the paper differs from Burge’s arguments mainly in two respects: it does not rely on thought experiments, and it makes a clear case for a social version of antiindividualism that is based on considerations not to be found in the Burgean account. I then defend the argument against some possible objections.
CITATION STYLE
Rechenauer, M. (2017). Tuomela Meets Burge. Another Argument for Anti-Individualism. In Studies in the Philosophy of Sociality (Vol. 8, pp. 179–191). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33236-9_13
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.