Bacterial quorum sensing applied to the coordination of autonomous robot swarms

6Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper proposes a strategy for the coordination of a swarm of robots in an unknown environment. The basic idea is to achieve the autonomous movement of the group from an initial region to a target region avoiding obstacles. We use a behavior model similar to bacterial Quorum Sensing (QS) as a technique for the coordination of robots. This behavior has been described as a key element in the interaction between bacteria, and we use it as a basic tool for local interaction, both between the robot and between the robot and the environment. The movement of the swarm of robots, or multi-agent robotic system, is shown as an emerging behavior resulting from the interaction of agents (in the context of artificial intelligence) from basic rules of behavior. The proposed strategy was successfully evaluated by simulation on a set of robots.

References Powered by Scopus

A Survey on Aerial Swarm Robotics

469Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Human Interaction with Robot Swarms: A Survey

309Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Occlusion-Based Cooperative Transport with a Swarm of Miniature Mobile Robots

140Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A review of multi-agent mobile robot systems applications

36Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An adaptive neural control methodology design for dynamics mobile robot

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Minimalistic Control Scheme for the Development of Search Tasks with Flocks of Robots

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fredy, S., Fernando Martínez, S., & Holman Montiel, A. (2020). Bacterial quorum sensing applied to the coordination of autonomous robot swarms. Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, 9(1), 67–74. https://doi.org/10.11591/eei.v9i1.1538

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

60%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

20%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

10%

Researcher 1

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 3

38%

Engineering 3

38%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 1

13%

Social Sciences 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0