Conceptions of Proof – In Research and Teaching

13Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This chapter first analyses and compares mathematicians’ and mathematics educators’ different conceptualisations of proof and shows how these are formed by different professional backgrounds and research interests. This diversity of views makes it difficult to precisely explain what a proof is, especially to a novice at proving. In the second section, we examine teachers’, student teachers’ and pupils’ proof conceptions and beliefs as revealed by empirical research. We find that the teachers’ beliefs clearly revolve around the questions of what counts as proof in the classroom and whether the teaching of proof should focus on the product or on the process. The third section discusses which type of metaknowledge about proof educators should provide to teachers and thus to students, how they can do this and what the intrinsic difficulties of developing adequate metaknowledge are.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cabassut, R., Conner, A. M., İşçimen, F. A., Furinghetti, F., Jahnke, H. N., & Morselli, F. (2012). Conceptions of Proof – In Research and Teaching. In New ICMI Study Series (Vol. 15, pp. 169–190). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2129-6_7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free