Evaluation of a new identification system, Crystal Enteric/Non-Fermenter, for gram-negative bacilli

35Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A total of 505 fermentative and 201 nonfermentative gram-negative bacilli, identified by conventional methods, were tested by the Crystal Enteric/Non- Fermenter ID kit and by the API 20E or API 20NE identification system. The overall correct results for fermenters were 92.9% by the Crystal kit and 89.1% by the API 20E system. The false identifications (genus and species incorrect) accounted for 3.1 and 7.1% for the Crystal and API systems, respectively. For nonfermenters, figures for correct identifications by the two systems were comparable (Crystal, 75.9%; API 20NE, 75.3%) while the API 20NE system gave twice as many incorrect results (13.8%) as Crystal (6.3%); however, Crystal failed to precisely identify several species included in a 'miscellaneous' group. The Crystal Enteric/Non-Fermenter system is an easy- to-use kit which compares favorably with other commercial systems.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wauters, G., Boel, A., Voorn, G. P., Verhaegen, J., Meunier, F., Janssens, M., & Verbist, L. (1995). Evaluation of a new identification system, Crystal Enteric/Non-Fermenter, for gram-negative bacilli. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 33(4), 845–849. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.33.4.845-849.1995

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free