The Overestimation Phenomenon in a Skill-Based Gaming Context: The Case of March Madness Pools

8Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Over 100 million people are estimated to take part in the NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournament Championship bracket contests. However, relatively little is known about consumer behavior in skill-based gaming situations (e.g., sports betting). In two studies, we investigated the overestimation phenomenon in the “March Madness” context. In Study 1 (N = 81), we found that individuals who were allowed to make their own predictions were significantly more optimistic about their performance than individuals who did not make their own selections. In Study 2 (N = 197), all subjects participated in a mock competitive bracket pool. In line with the illusion of control theory, results showed that higher self-ratings of probability of winning significantly increased maximum willingness to wager but did not improve actual performance. Lastly, perceptions of high probability of winning significantly contributed to consumers’ enjoyment and willingness to participate in a bracket pool in the future.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kwak, D. H. (2016). The Overestimation Phenomenon in a Skill-Based Gaming Context: The Case of March Madness Pools. Journal of Gambling Studies, 32(1), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-015-9520-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free