Case-based discussion supporting learning and practice in optometry

12Citations
Citations of this article
58Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: To enhance continuing professional development and address the risk that professional isolation poses, the UK General Optical Council introduced a requirement for all optometrists to engage in at least one case-based discussion per 3 year cycle of continuing education. In this paper, we explore participants' impression of the acceptability, effectiveness and long-term impact-on-practice of case-based discussion as a mode of continuing education. Methods: Case-based discussion participants attended an evening session comprising a lecture and a group discussion. They completed three questionnaires: prior to the session, immediately post-session and 3-4 months post-session. We coded the questionnaires to allow matching. Results: Seventy-five case-based discussion groups were held with 379 participants; 377 completed both pre- and post-questionnaires and 331 (88%) returned a follow-up questionnaire. Case-based discussions were an acceptable method of learning, with many preferring it to distance-learning. Prior to the event, women, employees and part-time workers were more likely to have concerns about participating. In terms of learning, gaps in knowledge were more likely to be revealed in those who work in isolation. The respondents highlighted social aspects, reassurance of practice as well as new learning. Participants significantly improved self-confidence ratings in all key learning areas. At three months post-session, the majority (75%) self-reported that they had implemented their intended changes to practice. Conclusions: The evaluation showed that participants felt that case-based discussion developed their knowledge, notably for sole practitioners, and influenced later workplace practice. The peer interaction of this mode of continuing education can combat professional isolation. © 2014 The College of Optometrists.

References Powered by Scopus

On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one

2343Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Impact of formal continuing medical education: Do conferences, workshops, rounds, and other traditional continuing education activities change physician behavior or health care outcomes?

1940Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A critical analysis of evaluation practice: The Kirkpatrick model and the principle of beneficence

366Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Project Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) in multiple sclerosis : Increasing clinician capacity

29Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The relationship between unwarranted variation in optometric referrals and time since qualification

16Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Tackling the challenge of the impact of continuing education: An evidence synthesis charting a global, cross-professional shift away from counting hours

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bullock, A., Barnes, E., Ryan, B., & Sheen, N. (2014). Case-based discussion supporting learning and practice in optometry. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 34(5), 614–621. https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.12151

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 25

66%

Lecturer / Post doc 7

18%

Researcher 4

11%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 15

48%

Nursing and Health Professions 10

32%

Social Sciences 4

13%

Physics and Astronomy 2

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0