Crowd dynamics of behavioural intention: train station and museum case studies

4Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

As the human population grows so does the need to understand human behaviour. One particularly important aspect of human behaviour is how it changes within conglomerations of people (i.e. crowds). In this article, a method for modelling crowd behaviour is proposed. This method draws inspiration from the concept of behavioural intention and the related forces of attitudes, influences, and social norms. These topics are first defined and detailed, followed by a survey of related research. Next, the model is presented and adapted to two common crowd dynamic scenarios, which stress a component of behavioural intention. Finally, observations are made about the model, as well as extensions to the models and directions for future research are considered.

References Powered by Scopus

The theory of planned behavior

60547Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Theory of Social Comparison Processes

13321Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review

7139Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Towards the cognitive and psychological perspectives of crowd behaviour: a vision-based analysis

18Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A force-driven model for passenger evacuation in bus fires

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Chaotic World: A Large and Challenging Benchmark for Human Behavior Understanding in Chaotic Events

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bouchard, M., Haegele, J., & Hexmoor, H. (2015). Crowd dynamics of behavioural intention: train station and museum case studies. Connection Science, 27(2), 164–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540091.2014.956291

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 22

79%

Researcher 3

11%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

7%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 10

40%

Engineering 8

32%

Social Sciences 4

16%

Psychology 3

12%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free