Dreamscapes: Topography, mind, and the power of simulacra in ancient and traditional societies

1Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Dream content can be influenced by external sounds, smells, touch, objects glimpsed with half-open eyes during REM sleep, and somatic signals. This paper suggests that this individual, neurologically-driven process parallels that experienced collectively by pre-industrial tribal and traditional peoples in which the land itself entered into the mental lives of whole societies, forming mythic geographies-dreamscapes. This dreamtime perception was particularly evident in the use of simulacra, in which the shapes of certain topographical features allowed them to be presented in anthropomorphic, zoomorphic, or iconic guise to both the individual and the culturally-reinforced gaze of society members. This paper further indicates that this mythologized way of seeing could theoretically, if with some effort and without embarrassment, be adopted periodically and temporarily by archaeologists and used as an investigative tool in the field, and could even have side benefits to modern societies in general.

References Powered by Scopus

The survey and excavation of a bronze age timber circle at Holme-next-the-sea, Norfolk, 1998-9

44Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cave experiences and ancient Greek oracles

20Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Why did they draw in those caves?

14Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Intersubjectivity, Empathy, Life-World, and the Social Brain: The Relevance of Husserlian Neurophenomenology for the Anthropology of Consciousness

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Devereux, P. (2013). Dreamscapes: Topography, mind, and the power of simulacra in ancient and traditional societies. International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, 32(1), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.24972/ijts.2013.32.1.51

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 2

33%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

33%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

17%

Researcher 1

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 3

43%

Arts and Humanities 2

29%

Neuroscience 1

14%

Social Sciences 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free