The impact of free allophonic variation on the perception of second language phonological categories

3Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

When learning the phonological categories of a second language (L2), learners have to deal with phonetic variation. For instance, allophonic variant forms have to be recognized as the same phoneme. A minimal pair identification task was used to assess how late Spanish learners of German perceive the phonological /r/-/h/ contrast. German /r/ was realized as one of three allophones ([r], [r], []) that vary in phonetic similarity to /h/ as well as to the typical phonetic form of Spanish /r/ (i.e., [r]). Results showed that learners were very good at identifying all German variant forms (>90% correct). However, [], which is phonetically closest to German /h/ and furthest from Spanish /r/, was identified significantly worse than [r] and [r]. Relating these results to a cross-language perception task where learners were asked to map the German allophones of /r/ and the phoneme /h/ to different L1 phonological categories further showed that those learners were best at identifying words with [] who consistently matched it to a single L1 category. Surprisingly this category did not always have to be the phonologically matching Spanish /r/. We conclude that phonological and phonetic relations between the learners' L1 and L2 are important in identifying allophones of the same L2 category.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Reinisch, E., Juhl, K. I., & Llompart, M. (2020). The impact of free allophonic variation on the perception of second language phonological categories. Frontiers in Communication, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.00047

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free