US-China Strategic Triangles: Theory and Reality of Indo-Pacific Insecurity

0Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This chapter outlines evolving geopolitical constructs rooted in terrestrial-vs.-maritime, and continental-vs.-oceanic formulations, used in analysing inter-state competition. It introduces the security complex framework, and builds on it to identify strategic triangles as a key tool for assessing the Trump-era Indo-Pacific insecurity milieu. It establishes the form and content of US-Chinese competition defining Trump’s strategic inheritance. It traces the trajectory of US post-Cold War policy of encouraging Beijing to acknowledge Washington’s systemic primacy while offering it limited shared influence. It records Beijing’s rejection of subordination, a hardening of America’s views of an apparently intransigent, even revisionist, actor, and China’s responsive strengthening of its national substance and its diplomatic carapace, thereby triggering competitive dialectics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ali, S. M. (2017). US-China Strategic Triangles: Theory and Reality of Indo-Pacific Insecurity. In Global Power Shift (pp. 1–46). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57747-0_1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free