‘Everybody has to think – do I have any peanuts and nuts in my lunch?’ School nurses, collective adherence, and children's food allergies

7Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Developing robust explanations for patients’ non-adherence to medical treatments is a pressing clinical concern. Social scientists have emphasised the importance of taking a ‘patient-centred’ approach to the study of illness management. Using data from a qualitative study of the management of children's food allergies, I found that school nurses created what I term collective adherence – the translation of individual medical recommendations into prescriptions to be followed by entire communities. School nurses secured collective adherence by aligning physicians, schools, and families around a particular interpretation of medical recommendations, setting guidelines of behaviour for the entire school community to follow, and balancing the diverging needs of illness sufferers and non-illness sufferers. This study contributes to the study of adherence by examining the medical recommendation as a dynamic prescription, extending adherence to the study of ancillary providers’ interaction with medical recommendations, and examining the impact of illness on non-family ties. I conclude with a discussion of implications for the field of school nursing; and potential applications of the collective adherence framework to the management of health conditions and health risks.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Muñoz, V. L. (2018). ‘Everybody has to think – do I have any peanuts and nuts in my lunch?’ School nurses, collective adherence, and children’s food allergies. Sociology of Health and Illness, 40(4), 603–622. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12716

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free