Examining alternatives to wavelet denoising for astronomical source finding

5Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The Square Kilometre Array and its pathfinders ASKAP and MeerKAT will produce prodigious amounts of data that necessitate automated source finding. The performance of automated source finders can be improved by pre-processing a dataset. In preparation for the WALLABY and DINGO surveys, we have used a test Hi datacube constructed from actual Westerbork Telescope noise and WHISP Hi galaxies to test the real world improvement of linear smoothing, the Duchamp source finder's wavelet denoising, iterative median smoothing and mathematical morphology subtraction, on intensity threshold source finding of spectral line datasets. To compare these pre-processing methods we have generated completeness-reliability performance curves for each method and a range of input parameters. We find that iterative median smoothing produces the best source finding results for ASKAP Hi spectral line observations, but wavelet denoising is a safer pre-processing technique. In this paper we also present our implementations of iterative median smoothing and mathematical morphology subtraction. Journal compilation © Australian Mammal Society 2012.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jurek, R., & Brown, S. (2012). Examining alternatives to wavelet denoising for astronomical source finding. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, 29(3), 352–358. https://doi.org/10.1071/AS12036

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free