Model and observed circulation throughout the annual temperature cycle of Lake Michigan.

10Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Monthly average currents and temperatures predicted by a three-dimensional, numerical model of Lake Michigan are compared with observations made in that lake during June-October 1976. The observed data are from 17 current meters with integral temperature recorders that were concentrated on a transverse section of the southern basin of the lake. A Wrief interpretation of the overall aspects of these data is given and the evolution of a deep temperature anomaly in the west central basin is discussed. Model results are evaluated in terms of their comparability with the dominant features of the observed data. Lakewide average temperatures in the model are reasonable and the signs of the computed and observed currents show some agreement. However, the model exaggerates upwelling along the upwind (western) shore, leading to temperature predictions that worsen progressively throughout the stratified season. The present study and other recent work suggest the need for improved mixed-layer physics in lake models. (A)

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Modeling circulation and thermal structure in Lake Michigan: Annual cycle and interannual variability

179Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Mesoscale Meteorological Modeling

127Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Modeling 1993-2008 climatology of seasonal general circulation and thermal structure in the Great Lakes using FVCOM

93Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Allender, J. H., & Saytor, J. H. (1979). Model and observed circulation throughout the annual temperature cycle of Lake Michigan. J. PHYS. OCEANOGR., 9(3, May 1979), 573–579. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1979)009<0573:maoctt>2.0.co;2

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘18‘19‘21‘2400.511.52

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

71%

Researcher 2

29%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Earth and Planetary Sciences 2

33%

Engineering 2

33%

Physics and Astronomy 1

17%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0