Patient safety in the operating room and documentary quality related to infection and hospitalization

6Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: To describe the documentary quality of two records related to patient safety in the operating room and to identify differences between information related to infection and hospitalization. Methods: Comparative study based on two cross sections, conducted with 3,033 patients who had been hospitalized for more than 24 hours in an Orthopedics and Traumatology Center. Sociodemographic and clinical data, as well as information provided in forms were compared. Postoperative infection was identified as an adverse event. Results: There was a significant correlation between hospitalization days and the total number of diagnoses collected (Pearson=0.328; p<0.001). When diagnoses and infections were grouped together, a significant value was found between closed fractures and infection (p=0.001). Conclusion: Differences in the degree of completion were observed between the two records. There were no differences between adverse events.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Manrique, B. T., Soler, L. M., Bonmati, A. N., Montesinos, M. J. L., & Roche, F. P. (2015). Patient safety in the operating room and documentary quality related to infection and hospitalization. ACTA Paulista de Enfermagem, 28(4), 355–360. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0194201500060

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free