CALIPSO lidar calibration at 532 nm: Version 4 daytime algorithm

55Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The Cloud Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) mission released version 4.00 of their lidar level 1 data set in April of 2014, and subsequently updated this to version 4.10 in November of 2016. The primary difference in the newly released version 4 (V4) data is a suite of updated calibration coefficients calculated using substantially revised calibration algorithms. This paper describes the revisions to the V4 daytime calibration procedure for the 532 nm parallel channel. As in earlier releases, the V4 daytime calibration coefficients are derived by scaling the raw daytime signals to the calibrated nighttime signals acquired within a calibration transfer region, and thus the new V4 daytime calibration benefits from improvements made to the V4 532 nm nighttime calibration. The V4 calibration transfer region has been moved upward from the upper troposphere to the more stable lower stratosphere. The identification of clear-air columns by an iterative thresholding scheme, crucial to selecting the observation regions used for calibration, now uses uncalibrated 1064 nm data rather than recursively using the calibrated 532 nm data, as was done in version 3 (V3). A detailed account of the rationale and methodology for this new calibration approach is provided, along with results demonstrating the improvement of this calibration over the previous version. Extensive validation data acquired by NASA's airborne high spectral resolution lidar (HSRL) shows that during the daytime the average difference between collocated CALIPSO and HSRL measurements of 532 nm attenuated backscatter coefficients is reduced from 3.3ĝ€† % ± 3.1 % in V3 to 1.0ĝ€† % ± 3.5 % in V4.

Figures

  • Figure 1: V3.40 532nm calibration coefficients between successive CALIPSO night-day-night orbits on December 18, 2016 15 from 20:15:31 to 22:40:41 UTC.
  • Figure 2: The 532 nm daytime correction factor for December 13-19, 2011 based on the V3 L1 algorithm. The correction factor is computed for both the V3 calibration transfer region (8-12km) and an elevated transfer region (18-22km) without 5 (a) and with (b) the baseline slope correction applied to the signal.
  • Figure 3: (a) 532nm total attenuated backscatter and (b) vertical feature mask derived from the V3.01 Lidar Level 1 and Level 2 data products for a nighttime orbital segment in October 13, 2010. For (b) the top of the features detected by the 1064 nm technique are identified by a solid white line, V3 calibration transfer regions are identified as red boxes, V4 calibration target regions are identified as green boxes, and the potential temperatures surface of 400K is a solid yellow 5 line. Profiles of uncalibrated 1064 nm signal with the applied detection threshold are shown in (c) – (e) for differing scenes contained in the orbit; clear, convective and cirrus respectively.
  • Figure 4: (a) 532 nm daytime calibration and error for a July 2nd, 2010 daytime granule. The calibration and uncertainty for the high latitude segment (> 2050 seconds in the gray shaded region) are anchored and linearly interpolated to the next 20 nighttime orbit. (b) The orbit track (red line) for which the calibration coefficients shown in panel (a) were derived, and the adjoining night-side orbit track (blue line). That portion of the orbit which is interpolated because of the lack of any night-side measurements is indicated by the black dashed black line.
  • Figure 5: Time series of (a) V4 532 nm daytime calibration coefficient anomalies, (b) calibration coefficient uncertainty anomalies, and (c) V4/V3 calibration ratio for June 13, 2006 to December 31, 2016 as functions of granule elapsed time. The calibration coefficients and uncertainties are extracted from the V4 and V3.x (3.01, 3.02, 3.30 and 3.40) L1 data files. The V4 532nm daytime calibration coefficient and uncertainty anomalies are scaled to the means of the time series: 5.0619x1010 5 km3·sr·J-1·counts and 4.5088x108 km3·sr·J-1·counts respectively.
  • Figure 6: Zonal clear-air attenuated scattering ratio (R΄); means (solid lines) ± one standard error (shaded regions) for day and night in the calibration transfer regions for (a) January, (b) April, (c) July, and (d) October 2010. Global monthly means are given for both daytime (μday) and nighttime (μnight).
  • Figure 7: Day / night ratio of clear-air attenuated scattering ratio (R΄) mean ± one standard error at 24-30 km for (a) V3 and (b) V4 for January, April, July, and October 2010. The SAA has been removed. 15
  • Figure 8: Ratio of the V4 532 nm daytime calibrations derived based on 1064 nm detection technique (new L1 algorithm) to the calibrations derived by applying 532 nm feature clearing for 2015 in black. Red error-bars indicate that the mean calibration uncertainty. Blue line is the ratio of V4 to V3 daytime calibrations.

References Powered by Scopus

The modern-era retrospective analysis for research and applications, version 2 (MERRA-2)

5451Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Overview of the CALIPSO mission and CALIOP data processing algorithms

1858Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Calipso Mission: A Global 3D View of Aerosols and Clouds

870Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The CALIPSO version 4 automated aerosol classification and lidar ratio selection algorithm

367Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Extinction and optical depth retrievals for CALIPSO's Version 4 data release

129Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Discriminating between clouds and aerosols in the CALIOP version 4.1 data products

91Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Getzewich, B. J., Vaughan, M. A., Hunt, W. H., Avery, M. A., Powell, K. A., Tackett, J. L., … Toth, T. D. (2018). CALIPSO lidar calibration at 532 nm: Version 4 daytime algorithm. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 11(11), 6309–6326. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-6309-2018

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 13

81%

Researcher 3

19%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Earth and Planetary Sciences 5

42%

Physics and Astronomy 3

25%

Engineering 3

25%

Chemical Engineering 1

8%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 14

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0