Does adding more agents make a difference? A case study of cover time for the rotor-router

15Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We consider the problem of graph exploration by a team of k agents, which follow the so-called rotor router mechanism. Agents move in synchronous rounds, and each node successively propagates agents which visit it along its outgoing arcs in round-robin fashion. It has recently been established by Dereniowski et al. (STACS 2014) that the rotor-router cover time of a graph G, i.e., the number of steps required by the team of agents to visit all of the nodes of G, satisfies a lower bound of Ω(mD/k) and an upper bound of O(mD/log k) for any graph with m edges and diameter D. In this paper, we consider the question of how the cover time of the rotor-router depends on k for many important graph classes. We determine the precise asymptotic value of the rotor-router cover time for all values of k for degree-restricted expanders, random graphs, and constant-dimensional tori. For hypercubes, we also resolve the question precisely, except for values of k much larger than n. Our results can be compared to those obtained by Elsässer and Sauerwald (ICALP 2009) in an analogous study of the cover time of k independent parallel random walks in a graph; for the rotor-router, we obtain tight bounds in a slightly broader spectrum of cases. Our proofs take advantage of a relation which we develop, linking the cover time of the rotor-router to the mixing time of the random walk and the local divergence of a discrete diffusion process on the considered graph. © 2014 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kosowski, A., & Paja̧k, D. (2014). Does adding more agents make a difference? A case study of cover time for the rotor-router. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 8573 LNCS, pp. 544–555). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43951-7_46

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free