The effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions including outdoor mobility on older adults' physical activity, endurance, outdoor mobility and falls-related self-efficacy: Systematic review and meta-Analysis

13Citations
Citations of this article
143Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the effectiveness of community-based rehabilitation interventions which incorporate outdoor mobility on physical activity, endurance, outdoor mobility and falls-related self-efficacy in older adults. Design: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PEDro and OpenGrey were searched systematically from inception to June 2021 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of community-based rehabilitation incorporating outdoor mobility on physical activity, endurance, outdoor mobility and/or falls-related self-efficacy in older adults. Duplicate screening, selection, extraction and appraisal were completed. Results were reported descriptively and with random-effects meta-Analyses stratified by population (proactive [community-dwelling], reactive [illness/injury]). Results: A total of 29 RCTs with 7,076 participants were identified (66% high bias for at least one domain). The outdoor mobility component was predominantly a walking programme with behaviour change. Rehabilitation for reactive populations increased physical activity (seven RCTs, 587 participants. Hedge's g 1.32, 95% CI: 0.31, 2.32), endurance (four RCTs, 392 participants. Hedges g 0.24; 95% CI: 0.04, 0.44) and outdoor mobility (two RCTs with 663 participants. Go out as much as wanted, likelihood of a journey) at intervention end versus usual care. Where reported, effects were preserved at follow-up. One RCT indicated a benefit of rehabilitation for proactive populations on moderate-To-vigorous activity and outdoor mobility. No effect was noted for falls-related self-efficacy, or other outcomes following rehabilitation for proactive populations. Conclusion: Reactive rehabilitation for older adults may include walking programmes with behaviour change techniques. Future research should address the potential benefit of a walking programme for proactive populations and address mobility-related anxiety as a barrier to outdoor mobility for both proactive and reactive populations.

References Powered by Scopus

The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

25749Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration

12246Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction - GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables

7295Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Review on BCI Virtual Rehabilitation and Remote Technology Based on EEG for Assistive Devices

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Systematic Review of the Long-Term Effects of Using Smartphone- and Tablet-Based Rehabilitation Technology for Balance and Gait Training and Exercise Programs

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A qualitative longitudinal study of motivation in the REtirement in ACTion (REACT) physical activity intervention for older adults with mobility limitations

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Geohagen, O., Hamer, L., Lowton, A., Guerra, S., Milton-Cole, R., Ellery, P., … Sheehan, K. J. (2022, June 1). The effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions including outdoor mobility on older adults’ physical activity, endurance, outdoor mobility and falls-related self-efficacy: Systematic review and meta-Analysis. Age and Ageing. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afac120

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 18

55%

Lecturer / Post doc 11

33%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

9%

Researcher 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 12

38%

Psychology 8

25%

Medicine and Dentistry 7

22%

Sports and Recreations 5

16%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 28

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free