On the dependence of response inhibition processes on sensory modality

42Citations
Citations of this article
55Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The ability to inhibit responses is a central sensorimotor function but only recently the importance of sensory processes for motor inhibition mechanisms went more into the research focus. In this regard it is elusive, whether there are differences between sensory modalities to trigger response inhibition processes. Due to functional neuroanatomical considerations strong differences may exist, for example, between the visual and the tactile modality. In the current study we examine what neurophysiological mechanisms as well as functional neuroanatomical networks are modulated during response inhibition. Therefore, a Go/NoGo-paradigm employing a novel combination of visual, tactile, and visuotactile stimuli was used. The data show that the tactile modality is more powerful than the visual modality to trigger response inhibition processes. However, the tactile modality loses its efficacy to trigger response inhibition processes when being combined with the visual modality. This may be due to competitive mechanisms leading to a suppression of certain sensory stimuli and the response selection level. Variations in sensory modalities specifically affected conflict monitoring processes during response inhibition by modulating activity in a frontal parietal network including the right inferior frontal gyrus, anterior cingulate cortex and the temporoparietal junction. Attentional selection processes are not modulated. The results suggest that the functional neuroanatomical networks involved in response inhibition critically depends on the nature of the sensory input.

References Powered by Scopus

Executive functions

8885Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention

6521Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Mapping the structural core of human cerebral cortex

3365Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Distinguishing stimulus and response codes in theta oscillations in prefrontal areas during inhibitory control of automated responses

79Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

On the relevance of EEG resting theta activity for the neurophysiological dynamics underlying motor inhibitory control

42Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The system-neurophysiological basis for how methylphenidate modulates perceptual–attentional conflicts during auditory processing

35Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bodmer, B., & Beste, C. (2017). On the dependence of response inhibition processes on sensory modality. Human Brain Mapping, 38(4), 1941–1951. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23495

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 20

54%

Researcher 11

30%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

16%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Neuroscience 12

43%

Psychology 8

29%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4

14%

Medicine and Dentistry 4

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0