Randomised Clinical Trial for Postoperative Complications after Ex-PRESS Implantation versus Trabeculectomy with 2-Year Follow-Up

40Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We compared complications between Ex-PRESS implantation and trabeculectomy for 2 years after surgery. Sixty-four open-angle glaucoma eyes were randomly assigned to treatment with trabeculectomy (n = 32) or Ex-PRESS implantation (n = 32). The primary outcomes were postoperative complications, including reduction of the endothelial cell density (ECD) of the cornea, cataract progression and the frequency of other late postoperative complications. The Ex-PRESS group had significantly greater reduction of postoperative corneal ECD than the trabeculectomy group did at 2 years after surgery (P = 0.026). Among the corneal areas measured using specular microscopy, the superior area, where the Ex-PRESS tube was inserted, had significantly more severe corneal ECD reduction than the inferior area after 2 years (−17.6% in superior area and −11.7% in inferior area, P = 0.04). More cataract progression occurred in the trabeculectomy group than in the Ex-PRESS group (P = 0.04). Twelve eyes (37.5%) in the trabeculectomy group and 4 eyes (12.5%) in the Ex-PRESS group underwent cataract surgery (P = 0.019). The total number of other postoperative complications between 3 months and 2 years was significantly higher in the trabeculectomy group than in the Ex-PRESS group (P = 0.02). Although Ex-PRESS implantation might be associated with an increased rate of corneal endothelial cell loss compared with trabeculectomy, it is beneficial for preventing cataract progression after filtering surgery.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Arimura, S., Miyake, S., Iwasaki, K., Gozawa, M., Matsumura, T., Takamura, Y., & Inatani, M. (2018). Randomised Clinical Trial for Postoperative Complications after Ex-PRESS Implantation versus Trabeculectomy with 2-Year Follow-Up. Scientific Reports, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-34627-w

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free