Prognostic role of neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A meta-analysis

33Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background Inflammatory markers are used to predict prognosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Previous reports of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and NPC mortality are inconsistent. This study aimed to quantify the prognostic impact of NLR on NPC. Methods The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcomes were disease-specific survival (DSS), progression-free survival (PFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). We systematically searched electronic databases, identified articles reporting an association between NLR and NPC prognosis. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted, and pooled HRs for each outcome were estimated using random effect models. Results Nine studies enrolling 5397 patients were included in the analyses. NLR greater than the cutoff value was associated with poor overall survival (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.27–1.78), disease-specific survival (HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.22–1.71), progression-free survival (HR 1.53, 95% CI 1.22–1.90), and distant metastasis-free survival (HR 1.83, 95% CI 1.14–2.95). Conclusions Elevated NLR predicts worse OS, DSS, PFS and DMFS in patients with NPC.

Figures

  • Fig 1. Flow diagram of article selection.
  • Table 1. Characteristics of the included studies.
  • Fig 2. Forest plot showing hazard ratios for overall survival for neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR). The squares represent HRs for each study. The sizes of the squares and the horizontal lines crossing the squares represent the weight of the study in the meta-analysis and 95% confidence intervals, respectively. The middle and width of the diamond indicates the pooled hazard ratio and its 95% confidence interval.
  • Table 2. Effect of NLR on OS between subgroups.
  • Fig 3. Forest plot showing hazard ratios (HRs) for disease-specific survival (A), progression-free survival (B), and distant metastasis-free survival (C) for neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR). The squares represent HRs for each study. The sizes of the squares and the horizontal lines crossing the squares represent the weight of the study in the meta-analysis and the 95% confidence intervals, respectively. The middle and width of the diamond indicates the pooled hazard ratio and its 95% confidence interval.
  • Fig 4. Funnel plot of hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival for neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio.

References Powered by Scopus

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement

22729Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in solid tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2388Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The enigmatic epidemiology of nasopharyngeal carcinoma

1127Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus lenvatinib or sorafenib in non-viral unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: an international propensity score matching analysis

82Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Platelet count and platelet-lymphocyte ratio as prognostic markers for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Meta-analysis

69Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in melanoma Evidence from a PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis

41Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Takenaka, Y., Kitamura, T., Oya, R., Ashida, N., Shimizu, K., Takemura, K., … Uno, A. (2017). Prognostic role of neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 12(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181478

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 13

52%

Researcher 8

32%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

12%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 16

73%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 3

14%

Immunology and Microbiology 2

9%

Computer Science 1

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0