BIGMAC: Breaking inaccurate genomes and merging assembled contigs for long read metagenomic assembly

7Citations
Citations of this article
65Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The problem of de-novo assembly for metagenomes using only long reads is gaining attention. We study whether post-processing metagenomic assemblies with the original input long reads can result in quality improvement. Previous approaches have focused on pre-processing reads and optimizing assemblers. BIGMAC takes an alternative perspective to focus on the post-processing step. Results: Using both the assembled contigs and original long reads as input, BIGMAC first breaks the contigs at potentially mis-assembled locations and subsequently scaffolds contigs. Our experiments on metagenomes assembled from long reads show that BIGMAC can improve assembly quality by reducing the number of mis-assemblies while maintaining or increasing N50 and N75. Moreover, BIGMAC shows the largest N75 to number of mis-assemblies ratio on all tested datasets when compared to other post-processing tools. Conclusions: BIGMAC demonstrates the effectiveness of the post-processing approach in improving the quality of metagenomic assemblies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lam, K. K., Hall, R., Clum, A., & Rao, S. (2016). BIGMAC: Breaking inaccurate genomes and merging assembled contigs for long read metagenomic assembly. BMC Bioinformatics, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-016-1288-y

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free