Improving primary care management of asthma: do we know what really works?

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
86Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Asthma imposes a substantial burden on individuals and societies. Patients with asthma need high-quality primary care management; however, evidence suggests the quality of this care can be highly variable. Here we identify and report factors contributing to high-quality management. Twelve primary care global asthma experts, representing nine countries, identified key factors. A literature review (past 10 years) was performed to validate or refute the expert viewpoint. Key driving factors identified were: policy, clinical guidelines, rewards for performance, practice organisation and workforce. Further analysis established the relevant factor components. Review evidence supported the validity of each driver; however, impact on patient outcomes was uncertain. Single interventions (e.g. healthcare practitioner education) showed little effect; interventions driven by national policy (e.g. incentive schemes and teamworking) were more effective. The panel’s opinion, supported by literature review, concluded that multiple primary care interventions offer greater benefit than any single intervention in asthma management.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fletcher, M. J., Tsiligianni, I., Kocks, J. W. H., Cave, A., Chunhua, C., Sousa, J. C. de, … van der Molen, T. (2020, December 1). Improving primary care management of asthma: do we know what really works? Npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine. Nature Research. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41533-020-0184-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free