Essentially unemployed: potential implications of the COVID-19 crisis and fiscal response on income inequality

1Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

I analyze the impact of the CARES Act unemployment subsidy on US income and inequality in the first month of the COVID-19 crisis using March-April Current Population Survey data. I then use monthly industry unemployment data to extend this panel to July. Next, I estimate the impact of the expiration of the CARES Act subsidy on average income and inequality. Finally, I extend the panel to November to simulate the effects of proposed HEALS and HEROES Acts. I find the CARES Act subsidy was effective at increasing average income above pre-crisis levels and reducing inequality. The expiration of the CARES Act subsidy caused a decrease in average income and increase in inequality relative to pre-crisis levels. I find the proposed HEALS legislation will return inequality to near pre-crisis levels, while the proposed HEROES Act will result in higher income and lower inequality than existed before the crisis.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schiavone, A. (2023). Essentially unemployed: potential implications of the COVID-19 crisis and fiscal response on income inequality. Review of Social Economy, 81(3), 469–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346764.2021.1890194

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free