Average correlations vs. correlated averages

17Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

When repeated-measures data are collected with small or even moderate sample sizes, correlation matrices show considerable variability. If one’s primary interest is in the correlations, some means of smoothing the coefficients may be desirable. Two methods of smoothing Pearson rs were investigated in the present study. The first method was to average repeated measures in blocks and then correlate block averages. In the second method, all repeated measures were correlated and then the correlation coefficients were averaged in blocks. The latter approach proved much superior, resulting in greatly reduced sampling variability and little distortion in the population correlation estimated. © 1983, The Psychonomic Society, Inc.. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dunlap, W. P., Jones, M. B., & Bittner, A. C. (1983). Average correlations vs. correlated averages. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 21(3), 213–216. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334690

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free