Improvement in Function after Lasmiditan Treatment: Post Hoc Analysis of Data from Phase 3 Studies

11Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: Migraine is associated with substantial functional impairment and affects many aspects of daily life. Methods: Using data from SAMURAI and SPARTAN (double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 studies) and GLADIATOR (an open-label, phase 3 study enrolling patients who had completed SAMURAI or SPARTAN), we assessed the effects of lasmiditan on migraine-related functional disability at multiple time points from 0.5 to 48 h post dose by asking patients to rate how much the migraine was interfering with normal activities. Pooled data from SAMURAI and SPARTAN (SAMURAI + SPARTAN) and data from GLADIATOR were analyzed using the intention-to-treat populations. Results: For SPARTAN + SAMURAI, significantly more patients who received lasmiditan at any dose versus placebo reported freedom from migraine-related functional disability at every timepoint from 2 h post dose, and this difference persisted to 48 h (p < 0.05). Significant differences from placebo in freedom from migraine-related functional disability commenced at 1 h post dose for lasmiditan 200 mg, 1.5 h for lasmiditan 100 mg, and 2 h for lasmiditan 50 mg. Findings from GLADIATOR supported those from SAMURAI + SPARTAN. Conclusion: All doses of lasmiditan resulted in an improvement in migraine-related functional disability that persisted to 48 h. In SAMURAI + SPARTAN, a significant difference from placebo was observed as early as 1 h post dose. Trial registration at clinicaltrials.gov: SAMURAI (NCT02439320), SPARTAN (NCT02605174), and GLADIATOR (NCT02565186).

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Smith, T., Krege, J. H., Rathmann, S. S., Dowsett, S. A., Hake, A., Nery, E. S. M., … Doty, E. G. (2020). Improvement in Function after Lasmiditan Treatment: Post Hoc Analysis of Data from Phase 3 Studies. Neurology and Therapy, 9(2), 459–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40120-020-00185-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free