Where is the Evidence? A Critical Review of Bias in the Reporting of Clinical Data for Exparel: A Liposomal Bupivacaine Formulation

  • P Dine A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Healthcare policies are formed through the dissemination of clinical information or evidence of effectiveness, so that this evidence can reach clinical practice. Manipulation or 'influence' over the data and the subsequent reporting of data can be introduced by anyone involved in a study. This may affect the perception of the evidence that becomes the basis for the determination of best practice in the care for our patients so it must be free of bias. This report illustrates an example of bias introduction into the clinical evidence portfolio of the recently introduced liposomal encapsulated bupivacaine Exparelâ„¢. This review then uses this new drug as an example of how bias is introduced into the clinical decision tree and its potential effect on the practice of medicine.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

P Dine, A. (2014). Where is the Evidence? A Critical Review of Bias in the Reporting of Clinical Data for Exparel: A Liposomal Bupivacaine Formulation. Journal of Clinical Research & Bioethics, 05(04). https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9627.1000189

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free