Response of photosynthetic apparatus to moderate high temperature in contrasting wheat cultivars at different oxygen concentrations

16Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The photosynthetic responses to moderately high temperatures (38°C, imposed at 21% or 2% O2 in air and 1500 μmol m-2 s -1) were compared in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars grown in northern regions of Ukraine and expected to be relatively sensitive to high temperatures ('North' cultivars) and in cultivars grown in southern regions and expected to be relatively heat-tolerant ('South' cultivars). Heating intact leaves in 21% O2 for 1 h decreased CO2 assimilation by c. 63% in 'North' cultivars and only c. 32% in 'South' cultivars, with a decrease in PSII activity being observed in only one of the 'North' cultivars. Carboxylation efficiency was decreased by about 2.7-fold in 'North' cultivars with no significant effect in 'South' cultivars. The maximum rates of carboxylation by Rubisco in vivo, Vcmax, estimated from Farquhar's model, increased more than 2-fold in 'South' cultivars and remained unchanged in 'North' cultivars while the maximum rate of RuBP regeneration, Jmax, decreased by 53% and 21% in 'North' and 'South' cultivars, respectively. Where the heat treatment was imposed in 2% O2 this increased (as compared with treatment at 21% O2) the inhibitory effect on CO2 assimilation in tolerant cultivars, but decreased it in sensitive ones. The results suggested that differences in tolerance of moderately high temperatures in wheat relate to the stability of the Rubisco function and to RuBP regeneration activity rather than to the effects on PSII activity or stomatal control. © 2007 The Author(s).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stasik, O., & Jones, H. G. (2007). Response of photosynthetic apparatus to moderate high temperature in contrasting wheat cultivars at different oxygen concentrations. Journal of Experimental Botany, 58(8), 2133–2143. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erm067

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free