Influence of surface treatment on tensile properties of low-density polyethylene/cellulose woven biocomposites: A preliminary study

17Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Cellulose woven (CW) was surface treated by means of hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide surfactant (HTAB) in aqueous solution medium at elevated temperature. The parameters of the surface treatment that have been studied are HTAB concentration (0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0 wt%) and treatment time (1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 h). The untreated and treated CW filled low-density polyethylene (LDPE) biocomposites were prepared via compression molding technique. The tensile testing results of LDPE/CW biocomposites demonstrated that the optimum HTAB concentration for treatment of CW in 1 h was 0.4 wt%, while the optimum treatment time at 0.4 wt% HTAB was 2 h. The SEM (scanning electron microscope) images indicated that there is no significant difference in the morphology of the untreated and treated CW; however the morphology of the LDPE/treated CW biocomposite showed better interfacial adhesion as compared with the untreated ones. The FTIR (Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy) spectra revealed that the presence of HTAB on the surface of treated CW and also revealed the existence of intermolecular interactions between LDPE and treated CW. In summary, HTAB could potentially be used as a treatment agent for modifying the surface of CW and consequently improved the tensile properties of LDPE/CW biocomposites.

Figures

  • Figure 1. Influences of hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide surfactant (HTAB) concentration on (a) tensile extension; (b) tensile strain; (c) tensile stress; and (d) modulus at break of low-density polyethylene (LDPE)/cellulose woven (CW) biocomposites.
  • Figure 2. Influences of treatment time on (a) tensile extension; (b) tensile strain; (c) tensile stress; and (d) modulus at break of LDPE/CW biocomposites.
  • Figure 3. SEM (scanning electron microscope) micrographs of the surfaces of the (a) untreated CW; (b) treated CW (at magnification of 50×); (c) untreated CW and (d) treated CW (at magnification of 3000×).
  • Figure 4. SEM micrographs of the fractured surfaces of the (a) LDPE/untreated CW biocomposite; (b) LDPE/treated CW biocomposite (at magnification of 50×); (c) LDPE/untreated CW biocomposite; and (d) LDPE/treated CW biocomposite (at magnification of 3000×).
  • Figure 5. FTIR spectra of the untreated CW, treated CW, LDPE, LDPE/untreated CW and LDPE/treated CW biocomposites.
  • Table 1. FTIR bands of the untreated CW, treated CW, LDPE, LDPE/untreated CW and LDPE/treated CW biocomposites.
  • Figure 6. Suggested interactional structure for the LDPE/treated CW biocomposites.

References Powered by Scopus

Cellulosic bionanocomposites: A review of preparation, properties and applications

1150Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Functionalization, compatibilization and properties of polyolefin composites with natural fibers

129Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

All green composites from fully renewable biopolymers: Chitosan-Starch reinforced with Keratin from feathers

88Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Fabrication and characterization of eco-friendly composite materials from natural animal fibers

34Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A short review on the effect of surfactants on the mechanico-thermal properties of polymer nanocomposites

29Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Application of quaternary ammonium compounds as compatibilizers for polymer blends and polymer composites-a concise review

26Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shamsuri, A. A., Azid, M. K. A., Ariff, A. H. M., & Sudari, A. K. (2014). Influence of surface treatment on tensile properties of low-density polyethylene/cellulose woven biocomposites: A preliminary study. Polymers, 6(9), 2345–2356. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym6092345

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 14

74%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

16%

Researcher 2

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Materials Science 7

37%

Engineering 6

32%

Chemistry 4

21%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0