The New Digital Cartesianism: Bodies and Spaces in Online Education

  • Boler M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Part of the Philosophy of Education Yearbook 2002. Despite similarities with Descartes's idealized disembodied thinking self, online users in a digital culture do not transcend the body but merely reinvoke it in stereotyped ways. The enlightenment man of reason has allegedly morphed into the neo-Liberal autonomous individual, whose online, disembodied presence fulfills Descartes's dream because of the alleged insignificance of the body to online interactions; the freedom, autonomy, and private interiority allowed by digital control; and the equation of existence with the rational consciousness of pure mind interacting with other minds. However, in reality, in online environments, difference is reductively defined by neo-Liberal definitions of the self; little evidence exists to suggest that users engage with differences of race, class, gender, or sexual orientation beyond their stereotyped conception; and in educational spaces, there is limited potential for the deep engagement and dialogue required for transformation. The implications of digital Cartesianism for online education are discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Boler, M. (2002). The New Digital Cartesianism: Bodies and Spaces in Online Education. Philosophy of Education, 58, 331–340. https://doi.org/10.47925/2002.331

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free