An evaluation of two calibration procedures using thermal desorption-gas chromatography in the analysis of odorous volatile compounds

1Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this study, the relative performance of gas chromatography (GC) was investigated with respect to the differences in two types of calibration approaches with a thermal desorption (TO) method: the fixed standard concentration approach (FSC: the comparison of different sample volumes for a given standard) was compared with the fixed standard volume approach (FSV:the comparison of different concentration standards at a fixed loading volume). Gaseous working standards of seven odorants, including methyl ethyl ketone (MEK), butyl acetate, methyl isobutyl ketone, isobutyl alcohol, toluene, xylene, and a reference component, benzene, were prepared atfour concentration levels (10-100 ppb). They were then analyzed by controlling the TO-loading volumes at six levels (40-1200 mL). The results derived by these contrasting calibration approaches showed moderate changes in the GC sensitivity, either with an increasing concentration (i.e., FSC), or with an increasing sample loading volume (i.e., FSV). Oespite an eccentric trend of MEK, the TO-based analysis was fairly predictable and can be recommended for the analysis of the selected odorants. © 2011 Publishing Technology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kabir, E., & Kim, K. H. (2011). An evaluation of two calibration procedures using thermal desorption-gas chromatography in the analysis of odorous volatile compounds. Journal of Chromatographic Science, 49(9), 731–738. https://doi.org/10.1093/chrsci/49.9.731

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free